Page 22 of 26

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 2:39 pm
by Khan4Cats
Another thing to add is that there is a definite money disparity between UNI and WSU. Yes, Marshall winning has helped in that, but WSU had a lot of money before he came and that makes a difference in where and who you can recruit. Look at UNI's roster and there are 6 players from outside Iowa and only 2 not from a neighboring state-one of those is a walk-on from Brazil who has appeared in 8 games. Contrast that to WSU that only has 3 players from Kansas and 3 more from immediate neighboring states, though Arkansas is close for Reaves.

The systems each runs fit in with the players they get/can get. I am glad that Jake hasn't tried the Lowery approach following success by trying to go out and just get the highest star rankings he can find. He continues to look for players that fit his system-though the overall talent ability is on an upward arc. Marshall plays a faster pace and looks for more 'athletic' players. He also makes them fit his system, if they don't want to play defense as well as offense, they tend to ride the pine. Marshall has a nice system where he can bring high level high school players and then supplement with jucos. Jake goes with 4/5 year players almost exclusively. Again, each system has worked for the school, and expectations, surrounding them.

Now to a different question. How nervous are WSU fans about the NC State opening, especially if the lack of strength in the Valley causes WSU to either be left out or seeded poorly in March?

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 2:42 pm
by TheObserver
Considering he's already turned it down once, id put my worry on a scale of 1 to 10 at about a 0.

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 2:44 pm
by Horn28Clem30
TheObserver wrote:Considering he's already turned it down once, id put my worry on a scale of 1 to 10 at about a 0.


Exactly! Now in 2 years, if the state of the Valley doesn't improve, or they aren't gone...then i'll worry. Right now w/ the ages of his kids, and all other things considered, I'm not sweating it near like a few years ago.

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 2:48 pm
by Stickboy46
TheObserver wrote:Considering he's already turned it down once, id put my worry on a scale of 1 to 10 at about a 0.


Not only did he turn it down. It turned it down when he was making less than half of what he is making right now.

Add in that it's not a truly elite job, Maggie will be a Senior next year, His team next year will most likely be a Top 15 team ... I don't think this is the year or the opportunity for him.

If Indiana opens up though .. I'll be concerned. I think Crean gets a pass this year because of all the injuries, but that could line it up perfect for after next year.

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 2:50 pm
by Cdizzle
With what he has coming back next year, I'd be surprised if there were more than about 3 possible jobs that would interest him.

But I don't know the man personally.

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 2:57 pm
by Khan4Cats
Stickboy46 wrote:
TheObserver wrote:Considering he's already turned it down once, id put my worry on a scale of 1 to 10 at about a 0.


Not only did he turn it down. It turned it down when he was making less than half of what he is making right now.

Add in that it's not a truly elite job, Maggie will be a Senior next year, His team next year will most likely be a Top 15 team ... I don't think this is the year or the opportunity for him.

If Indiana opens up though .. I'll be concerned. I think Crean gets a pass this year because of all the injuries, but that could line it up perfect for after next year.


Fair enough, I remember he passed the last time it was open. Don't know enough about his family to know that situation. I just remember WSU fans talking about one of their fears being Marshall not being able to have a shot at competing at the highest level nationally if the Valley continues to be a drag for seeding purposes. He certainly could stay in Wichita and build Gonzaga-like streaks of NCAA appearances-though I believe if he gets to 18 straight NCAA appearances he will have more than 5 Sweet Sixteens and 1 Elite Eight (he already has a Final Four to top them).

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 2:58 pm
by Stickboy46
I've said before, that i think this WSU is better than the last couple of years even without VanVleet and Baker.

This article lists a lot of the stats that agree with that. The biggest one is the 3 pt shooting. This is a lot better 3 pt shooting team than the last few years. Each of the losses last year in the MVC were all horrible 3 pt shooting games. I see that as a lot less likely to happen this year.

http://fansided.com/2017/02/17/wichita- ... haracters/

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 2:59 pm
by Cdizzle
Khan4Cats wrote:
Stickboy46 wrote:
TheObserver wrote:Considering he's already turned it down once, id put my worry on a scale of 1 to 10 at about a 0.


Not only did he turn it down. It turned it down when he was making less than half of what he is making right now.

Add in that it's not a truly elite job, Maggie will be a Senior next year, His team next year will most likely be a Top 15 team ... I don't think this is the year or the opportunity for him.

If Indiana opens up though .. I'll be concerned. I think Crean gets a pass this year because of all the injuries, but that could line it up perfect for after next year.


Fair enough, I remember he passed the last time it was open. Don't know enough about his family to know that situation. I just remember WSU fans talking about one of their fears being Marshall not being able to have a shot at competing at the highest level nationally if the Valley continues to be a drag for seeding purposes. He certainly could stay in Wichita and build Gonzaga-like streaks of NCAA appearances-though I believe if he gets to 18 straight NCAA appearances he will have more than 5 Sweet Sixteens and 1 Elite Eight (he already has a Final Four to top them).

I think it all hinges on the ability to get into, and get a reasonable seed, in the NCAA tournament with regularity out of the league WSU is in. If that is possible, Marshall has demonstrated he can do quite well, even when regularly under-seeded. But if good teams start getting left out, or keep going to the play-in game, I won't be shocked to see him leave. And I won't blame him for that. I'll blame Evansville.

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 3:03 pm
by uniftw
Cdizzle wrote:I think it all hinges on the ability to get into, and get a reasonable seed, in the NCAA tournament with regularity out of the league WSU is in. If that is possible, Marshall has demonstrated he can do quite well, even when regularly under-seeded. But if good teams start getting left out, or keep going to the play-in game, I won't be shocked to see him leave. And I won't blame him for that. I'll blame Evansville.

G-dangit, Morty Semmunds

Re: Who wins in St. Louis

PostPosted: February 17th, 2017, 3:07 pm
by moshock
Khan4Cats wrote:Another thing to add is that there is a definite money disparity between UNI and WSU. Yes, Marshall winning has helped in that, but WSU had a lot of money before he came and that makes a difference in where and who you can recruit. Look at UNI's roster and there are 6 players from outside Iowa and only 2 not from a neighboring state-one of those is a walk-on from Brazil who has appeared in 8 games. Contrast that to WSU that only has 3 players from Kansas and 3 more from immediate neighboring states, though Arkansas is close for Reaves.

The systems each runs fit in with the players they get/can get. I am glad that Jake hasn't tried the Lowery approach following success by trying to go out and just get the highest star rankings he can find. He continues to look for players that fit his system-though the overall talent ability is on an upward arc. Marshall plays a faster pace and looks for more 'athletic' players. He also makes them fit his system, if they don't want to play defense as well as offense, they tend to ride the pine. Marshall has a nice system where he can bring high level high school players and then supplement with jucos. Jake goes with 4/5 year players almost exclusively. Again, each system has worked for the school, and expectations, surrounding them.

Now to a different question. How nervous are WSU fans about the NC State opening, especially if the lack of strength in the Valley causes WSU to either be left out or seeded poorly in March?


Very good post !

I'm not nervous at all about NC State. I'm told that the AD is a donk. How do you fire someone mid season who has been to the NCAA's 4 out of 6 seasons ? Coach Marshall turned them down a few years ago before the Shox had done a whole lot. The future is bright at WSU. He's also the 9th highest paid coach in NCAA MBB. Most (if not all) of 1 - 8 have won a NC. I just don't see it.