unipanther99 wrote:While I suppose it's good to have these additional cameras, I've always been more of a traditionalist. In a close game, you have to accept there is a certain amount of chance and luck involved in how the game will turn out. If you don't like that, make sure to keep your lead around 5 points or more.
Birdfan10 wrote:unipanther99 wrote:While I suppose it's good to have these additional cameras, I've always been more of a traditionalist. In a close game, you have to accept there is a certain amount of chance and luck involved in how the game will turn out. If you don't like that, make sure to keep your lead around 5 points or more.
So rather than determine a games outcome by the rules it is better to have it be lucky and incorrect?
WSUbballer wrote:SirShoxAlot wrote:I love how this past March Madness, CU fans were wearing "1.9" as a badge of honor. Congrats on winning the game because of a time keeping error! Classic!
CU fans got to enjoy about 1.9 seconds of St. Louis last year.
AndShock wrote:Is there a vid from a CU fan showing the shot was off in time? I know there are vids from 2 different shocker fans that show the shot wasn't in time.
AndShock wrote:I'd like the links to the hundreds of Husker videos, I know the game you're talking about and I'd like to see how Nebraska fans think they got screwed over, I did a basic youtube search and couldn't come up with anything, I'm sure they're out there, I just can't find them. I'd also like the Lutz article/any other article saying Creighton really got the shot off in time. I think the thing I'd most like to see is a frame-by-frame video not done by a WSU fan to remove all bias. I honestly wasn't even aware that people really do think Woodfox legitimately got that shot off, of course that might just be my closed-minded bias. But I really thought even CU fans knew that shot shouldn't have counted, maybe I just wasn't reading enough of the BJ Cafe when it happened and I missed all of the debate.
AndShock wrote:First of all, I think there's a considerable difference between conspiracy theories and video evidence. I'm not really considering Shocks and Huskers the same until I see the hundreds of videos you were referring to that "proves" the Huskers were screwed over. I don't think the outcome is what matters too much, I think the fact that when instant replay gets brought up, the CU-WSU game is the first thing that comes to mind for probably every WSU fan. I'm looking at a shockwaves blog from back then and apparently the claim was Woodfox would've released the shot with .4 seconds left if the clock started on time. That's believable, but I'm honestly never going to believe it unless I actually see it. Considering the only video I've seen shows him releasing the ball with 0.0 on the clock.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: BigMacAttack, Google Adsense [Bot], SalukiWorld and 68 guests