DoubleJayAlum wrote:WSUbballer wrote:But I think their perspective is a little off.
How so?
I can understand not wanting to buy into the hype until seeing him play. However, I don't understand the perspective comment.
WSUbballer wrote:DoubleJayAlum wrote:WSUbballer wrote:But I think their perspective is a little off.
How so?
I can understand not wanting to buy into the hype until seeing him play. However, I don't understand the perspective comment.
Probably not the best word choice. I just think because they've been waiting so long for an inside go-to guy or strong inside presence that some CU fans think that they have things locked up based on something they finally have that other teams have already had.
Does that make sense? Probably not.
DoubleJayAlum wrote:WSUbballer wrote:DoubleJayAlum wrote:How so?
I can understand not wanting to buy into the hype until seeing him play. However, I don't understand the perspective comment.
Probably not the best word choice. I just think because they've been waiting so long for an inside go-to guy or strong inside presence that some CU fans think that they have things locked up based on something they finally have that other teams have already had.
Does that make sense? Probably not.
With all due respect, Lawson hasn't exactly been a failure. Without being a homer, I think it is fair to say that he was been one of the best big men in the conference last year. Since he made all conference teams, the other coahces/media in the league would seemingly agree.
Is last year really that long ago that we have been "waiting so long?" (Not to mention the fact that he is back this year...)
beatingrillz wrote:It is really sad that a bottom dweller Big East school has a transfer and the CU homers and the Pope think he is the anointed one of the valley. Give me a break he will be good but i dont think he will even be an all valley player this season
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests