uniftw wrote:MissouriValleyUnite wrote:I stated this the day WSU left.
An expansion to 11 with both Valpo/Murray is an A+.
An expansion to 10 with only one is a complete failure.
F.
I voted F.
While not fair to Valpo, the grade is not a reflection on Valpo. It's a reflection on the conference leadership, on the process, and the failure to see past the tip of their upturned noses.
TheAsianSensation wrote:I think Valpo was the correct #10.
I disagree with the decision to stop at 10, but if you're going to stop there.....I think the right choice was made. It's close, but the right one.
isumvc1 wrote:agree with everyone here, adding Valpo is great, Stopping at 1 team only is an F grade, just absolute short sighted thinking by the MVC presidents, terrible, terrible stuff.
And so it's announced they will continue to look at expansion for the next 9 months, well, what if the teams we really want to add get taken away by a different conference? Then who are we left with?
Always reactive, never proactive the MVC way
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 31 guests