Serious Question

Discuss the MVC hoops season here.

Re: Serious Question

Postby Jsnhbe1Birds » May 12th, 2017, 5:05 pm

Even worse, Matt Doherty.
Jsnhbe1Birds
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: April 10th, 2017, 4:20 pm

Re: Serious Question

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Serious Question

Postby BirdsEyeView » May 12th, 2017, 5:10 pm

Jsnhbe1Birds wrote:Even worse, Matt Doherty.


Last time I checked all those UNC fans didnt help hire those coaches, the AD did.

This guy is trying to,make himself more important than he really is at that school. Yes, you help create a great home atmosphere, yes you guys give money to the athletic department, but no you don't offer the head coaching job to a coach, which historically came from the ranks of the low majors looking to advance their careers to a bigger basketball program
BirdsEyeView
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 12:51 pm

Re: Serious Question

Postby BirdsEyeView » May 12th, 2017, 5:23 pm

Fan support helps with recruiting and with retention. Not with the direction of the basketball program once Marshall leaves. That's on the Athletic Director...to think otherwise is not smart.
BirdsEyeView
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 12:51 pm

Re: Serious Question

Postby Stickboy46 » May 12th, 2017, 8:11 pm

BirdsEyeView wrote:
Jsnhbe1Birds wrote:Even worse, Matt Doherty.


Last time I checked all those UNC fans didnt help hire those coaches, the AD did.

This guy is trying to,make himself more important than he really is at that school. Yes, you help create a great home atmosphere, yes you guys give money to the athletic department, but no you don't offer the head coaching job to a coach, which historically came from the ranks of the low majors looking to advance their careers to a bigger basketball program

You really don't get it. Kinda sad
Stickboy46
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 710
Joined: April 21st, 2015, 9:24 am

Re: Serious Question

Postby BirdsEyeView » May 12th, 2017, 8:35 pm

Stickboy46 wrote:
Me: Fan Support is important and one of the key components to success. It doesnt cure all and doesn't guarantee success but it puts you in a way better position.

You: look at these examples of places that failed with great fan support therefore fan support doesn't contribute to success and isn't necessary.



No sir, you clearly don't get it. For 4 pages you thought my argument was the above, how sad. Comprehension is a funny thing, harder for some than others. Clearly a WSU education wasn't good, because what you thought my argument was about mentioned by you above, was not close. Because of that, I feel like a repeater...

Fan support is helpful, but not when turnover happens at the head coaching position. YOU as a fan of Wichita have no influence on the future head coach of your program. You might think so, but fan support, money given to the program, etc. does not.

UNC is a clear example of it over the years when they made bad hires. Fan support is good for branding the program. Fan support is good for recruitment, fan support is good for helping fundraise the athletic department, fan support helps you at home games. However, it does not have any major impact when it comes to the decision of your next basketball coach at a mid-major level or even at the AAC level.

The difference: you see Kansas has prestige, Kansas has blue blood branding where they can steal a coach from another top end program (Bill Self from Illinois after they made the Elite 8 the year prior). While WIchita played in the MVC, yet made a Final Four and got national recognition for some of their results, you still won't be able to just take a top level coach from another program due to the fan support that has helped create the brand that is Wichita State.
If GM left WSU to Alabama a few years ago, do you think your fan support and money associated with it was really going to get you a name coach? No, you would have gotten a former assistant (Chris Jans probably) or somebody from a p5 program's bench or a low major again. Fan support would not have done that for you. The AD would have had a pool of candidates and made a selection from there.

Fan support contributes to your teams success in the present, however it has zero influence on a (Former) MVC teams next head coach after Marshall would have moved on. And, If you think they would have paid someone $3 million dollars from a Big 12 school for example, in 2015 to replace him, and that coach would have left their P5 job to slum it in the MVC, then you are badly mistaken.
BirdsEyeView
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 12:51 pm

Re: Serious Question

Postby Stickboy46 » May 12th, 2017, 8:43 pm

BirdsEyeView wrote:
Stickboy46 wrote:
Me: Fan Support is important and one of the key components to success. It doesnt cure all and doesn't guarantee success but it puts you in a way better position.

You: look at these examples of places that failed with great fan support therefore fan support doesn't contribute to success and isn't necessary.



No sir, you clearly don't get it. For 4 pages you thought my argument was the above, how sad. Comprehension is a funny thing, harder for some than others. Clearly a WSU education wasn't good, because what you thought my argument was about mentioned by you above, was not close. Because of that, I feel like a repeater...

Fan support is helpful, but not when turnover happens at the head coaching position. YOU as a fan of Wichita have no influence on the future head coach of your program. You might think so, but fan support, money given to the program, etc. does not.

UNC is a clear example of it over the years when they made bad hires. Fan support is good for branding the program. Fan support is good for recruitment, fan support is good for helping fundraise the athletic department, fan support helps you at home games. However, it does not have any major impact when it comes to the decision of your next basketball coach at a mid-major level or even at the AAC level.

The difference: you see Kansas has prestige, Kansas has blue blood branding where they can steal a coach from another top end program (Bill Self from Illinois after they made the Elite 8 the year prior). While WIchita played in the MVC, yet made a Final Four and got national recognition for some of their results, you still won't be able to just take a top level coach from another program due to the fan support that has helped create the brand that is Wichita State.
If GM left WSU to Alabama a few years ago, do you think your fan support and money associated with it was really going to get you a name coach? No, you would have gotten a former assistant (Chris Jans probably) or somebody from a p5 program's bench or a low major again. Fan support would not have done that for you. The AD would have had a pool of candidates and made a selection from there.

Fan support contributes to your teams success in the present, however it has zero influence on a (Former) MVC teams next head coach after Marshall would have moved on. And, If you think they would have paid someone $3 million dollars from a Big 12 school for example, in 2015 to replace him, and that coach would have left their P5 job to slum it in the MVC, then you are badly mistaken.


Yet again, missing the point. Sad. Good evening sir. I'm out, it's pretty obvious you aren't capable of understanding this.
Stickboy46
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 710
Joined: April 21st, 2015, 9:24 am

Re: Serious Question

Postby BirdsEyeView » May 12th, 2017, 9:05 pm

And clearly you don't understand my point either. Sad. Fan support can help you win games, it can't help you avoid hiring Matt Doherty as your next head coach.

Good luck in the AAC.
BirdsEyeView
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 12:51 pm

Re: Serious Question

Postby mvcfan » May 13th, 2017, 1:20 pm

The sad thing really is that I think that Stickboy and BirdsEyeView are really agreeing. Fan support is important but not a guarantee that success continues. However, the support helped N. Carolina recover from a bad hire.

WSU will not be able to steal a coach from a Blue Blood Program like North Carolina did, but can compete with non-blue blood P5 programs for coaches (Jamie Dixon went from Pitt to TCU is an example). But I would argue that WSU's next coach needs to be a good fit to have a vision for what can happen at a program like WSU (like Marshall did) who probably won't have football, but enjoys wide support from the entire city and wants to compete with the BEST. The same people who are paying Marshall's salary are willing to pay for another "winner" like Gregg. The next coach's salary won't begin at 3 Million but likely will begin at 1-2 Million and increase if/when it is deserving.
mvcfan
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 634
Joined: July 31st, 2012, 10:57 pm

Re: Serious Question

Postby Jsnhbe1Birds » May 13th, 2017, 2:18 pm

Wsu won't go low mid-May again. Too risky. VCU has had two coaches since Shaka smart left. Both of them have been smart's disciples to keep the program going in the same direction and similar style of play. I imagine wsu will do the same. Either that or go for a major coach that has fallen out of favor. My guess? Chris Jans will be their next coach if Marshall ever leaves. I wouldn't bet on Marshall leaving now that they're in the AAC, however. Why? He's getting a bump to $3.5-million this season with incentives added in he could make up to $-4-million. Even at 3.5 he will be about the eighth highest paid coach in all of college basketball. And, he will get annual raises to keep him at that level. The ONLY reason Marshall leaves if his dream job opens up or someone like Roy Williams retires and NC offers to pay him like $7-million. No reason to go to a major program just to go if you're already getting paid like you are at one. If that was the case he would have already been gone.
Jsnhbe1Birds
MVC Hall Of Famer
MVC Hall Of Famer
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: April 10th, 2017, 4:20 pm

Re: Serious Question

Postby C0|db|00ded » May 13th, 2017, 2:52 pm

Just a couple clarifications:

Charles Koch affects Wichita State in many more ways than just a coach's salary.

"During the 25m Roundhouse Renaissance in 2002, initial pledges totaled nearly $13 million (including a $6 million gift from Koch Industries Inc.)."

http://www.bizjournals.com/wichita/prin ... 5m-to.html

"Koch Industries Inc. and the Fred and Mary Koch Foundation have given $11.25 million to the university to fund several academic and athletics initiatives. The gift, announced Tuesday, continues a long-standing relationship between Koch and Wichita State."

A couple years ago 3G decided that the locker room needed a BCS face-lift in order to wow high level recruits. The cost for the makeover was 250k. A private donation appeared almost instantly to make that happen.

As stickboy has mentioned, nothing happens without community support, but nothing also happens without big-time donations. Charles Koch should be lauded for his support to a university he never attended (MIT), but he ain't the only fella with deep pockets. There are literally dozens and dozens of boosters that routinely offer up the 6-7 figure checks. If Charles was donating in amounts relative to his net worth, we'd be getting checks in the 100 million dollar range. I'm still hoping that when he kicks the bucket he leaves an endowment of 5 billion or so - firmly establishing the university for decades to come.

As far as basketball success is concerned, it wasn't all money that brought us to this point. Wichita State has been experiencing highly successful periods since the '50's. There's many reasons for that, namely, that the Shockers are the main event in town. Support has always been high for that reason. By support I mean butts in seats. As was already mentioned, athletes like to play in full buildings for obvious reasons. Performance is bolstered by the energy of a large crowd. This is a definite recruiting advantage.

After our most recent athletic recession (90's), we hired a sensational AD in Jim Schaus. Under his leadership, we entered the latest iteration of a "Golden Era". Everything was in place. All he needed to do was instill confidence in the beleaguered community and the well started pumping again. That's Wichita State's advantage. Even though the well may occasionally stop pumping, it never runs dry.

A couple final points:

Turgeon is a job hopper. He would take the first decent offer he received as long as he had Deputy Dog's permission (Roy Williams).

Gregg Marshall is an entirely different cat. He turned down several low-level BCS jobs while at Winthrop where he coached 9 years. He's famous for saying you don't mess with happy and how many hamburgers can a guy eat? He's educated in Economics so he understands clearly the importance of a free market. His belief in such philosophies no doubt endeared him to Charles Koch and makes him keenly aware of what his market value is. Gregg Marshall to Wichita State was not a done deal until he received many assurances. He DID NOT choose this job for the money. He truly believed the program fit him as a person - which it does. After his first horrific year, he went up to the AD and asked him to fire him. The stress of adapting to a new program and reviving it to Gregg Marshall standards no doubt is a strong disincentive to move again. Gregg likes to win and win for the sake of winning. The money will take care of itself. He would be wholly unhappy as a coach in the ACC finishing 3rd every year no matter what they paid him. He wants to be #1. He was #1 in the Big South, he was #1 in the MVC, and he expects to be #1 in the AAC.

To say it's a great day to be a Shocker is an understatement.


T


...:cool:
User avatar
C0|db|00ded
All MVC
All MVC
 
Posts: 471
Joined: November 26th, 2010, 1:35 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 248 guests