Cdizzle wrote:So far, fans of AAC members are overwhelmingly supportive
Good. I'm happy for you. Take your final swings punching down and then go hang out over there. We'll sort our ish out in due time.
Cdizzle wrote:So far, fans of AAC members are overwhelmingly supportive
Cdizzle wrote:When one can't refute with facts, one turns to movie references.
So far, fans of AAC members are overwhelmingly supportive of adding a nationally relevant program to their conference. I know the concept is foreign to some around here.
Cdizzle wrote:When one can't refute with facts
Redhawk wrote:Cdizzle wrote:When one can't refute with facts, one turns to movie references.
So far, fans of AAC members are overwhelmingly supportive of adding a nationally relevant program to their conference. I know the concept is foreign to some around here.
You have an inflated opinion of the national relevance of WSU. Since college football is king the Shockers
are arguably at best the 8th most valuable school in the AAC. Then you also need to factor in that the AAC
is the 7th best basketball conference in the NCAA. The Shockers are a long way from true relevance!
Blers wrote:Cdizzle wrote:When one can't refute with facts
There's plenty of people who've tried to debate with facts with several (mostly trolling) WSU fans. It's clearly become a waste of time. When faced with objective realities, you don't respond to them and look for a different angle to stir the pot. I mean multiple posters corrected you on how game contracts work and what a buyout actually is and you said nothing, but moved on to another target. It's just lame, and hard to respect.
It makes it so it's not worth anyone's time to put work into a response. There are a group of posters i really like reading from on this board, who i like to go in depth with and read/write long posts. But with constant dismissiveness of any other points and no ammo to back up your most egregious claims, going back and forth with you is pointless (if LU is a low major than half the leagues a low major, which i'm sure you'll have no problem claiming either...without anything to back it up). Shouts out to all the cool Wichita posters who moved on/were cool in general!
BirdsEyeView wrote:Blers wrote:Cdizzle wrote:When one can't refute with facts
There's plenty of people who've tried to debate with facts with several (mostly trolling) WSU fans. It's clearly become a waste of time. When faced with objective realities, you don't respond to them and look for a different angle to stir the pot. I mean multiple posters corrected you on how game contracts work and what a buyout actually is and you said nothing, but moved on to another target. It's just lame, and hard to respect.
It makes it so it's not worth anyone's time to put work into a response. There are a group of posters i really like reading from on this board, who i like to go in depth with and read/write long posts. But with constant dismissiveness of any other points and no ammo to back up your most egregious claims, going back and forth with you is pointless (if LU is a low major than half the leagues a low major, which i'm sure you'll have no problem claiming either...without anything to back it up). Shouts out to all the cool Wichita posters who moved on/were cool in general!
Well said.
Shocker fans overvalue themselves as being more important than others just for who they cheer for. BUT, when they don't have superiority over others in their new conference (such as schools like UCONN who has a rich history), they need to come back here to make themselves feel better.
Cdizzle fits that description to a T.
Lusuperfan1 wrote:Cdizzle wrote:So far, fans of AAC members are overwhelmingly supportive
Good. I'm happy for you. Take your final swings punching down and then go hang out over there. We'll sort our ish out in due time.
Blers wrote:There's plenty of people who've tried to debate with facts with several (mostly trolling) WSU fans. It's clearly become a waste of time. When faced with objective realities, you don't respond to them and look for a different angle to stir the pot. I mean multiple posters corrected you on how game contracts work and what a buyout actually is and you said nothing, but moved on to another target. It's just lame, and hard to respect.
Cdizzle wrote:Redhawk wrote:Cdizzle wrote:When one can't refute with facts, one turns to movie references.
So far, fans of AAC members are overwhelmingly supportive of adding a nationally relevant program to their conference. I know the concept is foreign to some around here.
You have an inflated opinion of the national relevance of WSU. Since college football is king the Shockers
are arguably at best the 8th most valuable school in the AAC. Then you also need to factor in that the AAC
is the 7th best basketball conference in the NCAA. The Shockers are a long way from true relevance!
Conference's don't make one relevant. Individual programs are relevant. Northern Iowa basketball is nationally relevant. Evansville basketball is not.
Conferences can help or hinder a program's ability to gain national relevance.
Return to Missouri Valley Conference Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests