MVCfans.com

DUBulldog wrote:

FeartheQ wrote:1. Springfield
2. Wichita

3-10. I have never been

Holy thread revival, Batman.

Troublemakers!!!!

I think there needs to be an impartial way to rank cities. The Cheesecake Factory factor is biased and unreliable.

I've done further studies, several double blind studies, and have come up with a factor that is unbiased and very reliable. Without further adieu, I give you the HuHot Quality of Life Index (HHQLI).

First and foremost, if a city doesn't have a HuHot, is less of a city compared to any city with a HuHot. If two cities have HuHots, the city with the most HuHots is a better city. If two cities have the same number of HuHots, the city with a HuHot located in a more ethnically diverse area is a better city.

In rating cities that do not have a Hu Hot, the city which is nearer to a HuHot in another metropolitan area is the better city. If the distance to the nearest HuHot is equal between two cities, then the city closest to George the Chili King is better.

See, this is totally unbiased and well thought out. It includes every factor needed to determine the quality of life of a city. Now we can put this thread to rest.

For Shocker fans, there is a HuHot on 21st and North Rock Road.

There are HuHot's in Layfayette and Bloomington, IN. That may be why Evansville and Indiana State fans get no respect from Indiana and Purdue.

I told you, the HHQLI really works!

MoValley John wrote:

DUBulldog wrote:

FeartheQ wrote:1. Springfield
2. Wichita

3-10. I have never been

Holy thread revival, Batman.

Troublemakers!!!!

I think there needs to be an impartial way to rank cities. The Cheesecake Factory factor is biased and unreliable.

I've done further studies, several double blind studies, and have come up with a factor that is unbiased and very reliable. Without further adieu, I give you the HuHot Quality of Life Index (HHQLI).

First and foremost, if a city doesn't have a HuHot, is less of a city compared to any city with a HuHot. If two cities have HuHots, the city with the most HuHots is a better city. If two cities have the same number of HuHots, the city with a HuHot located in a more ethnically diverse area is a better city.

In rating cities that do not have a Hu Hot, the city which is nearer to a HuHot in another metropolitan area is the better city. If the distance to the nearest HuHot is equal between two cities, then the city closest to George the Chili King is better.

See, this is totally unbiased and well thought out. It includes every factor needed to determine the quality of life of a city. Now we can put this thread to rest.

Springfield has a HuHot AND an unlimited supply of cashew chicken

I have my method for determining the worst Valley cities. If your favorite Valley school is in a state that has a Runza in it then guess what your state and town are both terrible.

CaseyGarrisonforPrez wrote:I have my method for determining the worst Valley cities. If your favorite Valley school is in a state that has a Runza in it then guess what your state and town are both terrible.

See, that is where your logic is flawed. I'm not sure, but it may be the same type of logic that fails you so often on this board. Let me explain, you don't downgrade a city for having choices, you downgrade them for NOT having choices. It would be like saying Chatanooga, TN is a horrible town because they have a Piggly Wiggly. While it is correct that Chattanooga is a horrible town, it isn't because they HAVE a Piggly Wiggly, it's because they DON'T have a HuHot.

With that logic, you would have to say that Des Moines sucks because they have Boesen the Florist. Des Moines doesn't suck simply because they have Boesen the Florist, Des Moines is a great city because they have plenty of florists in which to choose.

More choices- Good. Less choices-Bad.

MoValley John wrote:

CaseyGarrisonforPrez wrote:I have my method for determining the worst Valley cities. If your favorite Valley school is in a state that has a Runza in it then guess what your state and town are both terrible.

See, that is where your logic is flawed. I'm not sure, but it may be the same type of logic that fails you so often on this board. Let me explain, you don't downgrade a city for having choices, you downgrade them for NOT having choices. It would be like saying Chatanooga, TN is a horrible town because they have a Piggly Wiggly. While it is correct that Chattanooga is a horrible town, it isn't because they HAVE a Piggly Wiggly, it's because they DON'T have a HuHot.

With that logic, you would have to say that Des Moines sucks because they have Boesen the Florist. Des Moines doesn't suck simply because they have Boesen the Florist, Des Moines is a great city because they have plenty of florists in which to choose.

More choices- Good. Less choices-Bad.

MoVally John....you know better....Logic and Casey do not go together.

I haven't eaten at HuHot, but have been told it's more expensive and not as good as Genghis Grill. Can anyone verify that for me?

And I think Casey is a lost cause. But he's funny in his own little way.

SubGod22 wrote:I haven't eaten at HuHot, but have been told it's more expensive and not as good as Genghis Grill. Can anyone verify that for me?

And I think Casey is a lost cause. But he's funny in his own little way.

You aren't missing much in terms of HuHot. It is as overrated as Notre Dame football. I had a bad first date experience there once so perhaps I am biased.

I am hilarious when taken with a grain of salt. Thank you for the compliment.

CaseyGarrisonforPrez wrote:

SubGod22 wrote:I haven't eaten at HuHot, but have been told it's more expensive and not as good as Genghis Grill. Can anyone verify that for me?

And I think Casey is a lost cause. But he's funny in his own little way.

You aren't missing much in terms of HuHot. It is as overrated as Notre Dame football. I had a bad first date experience there once so perhaps I am biased.

I am hilarious when taken with a grain of salt. Thank you for the compliment.

No you're not...