Page 1 of 2

Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 24th, 2010, 9:27 pm
by dgreenwell3
Should be a good one....

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 24th, 2010, 9:31 pm
by 45otseoj
Western... BIG

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 24th, 2010, 9:38 pm
by dgreenwell3
45otseoj wrote:Western... BIG

disagree....lol I think the Sycamores are better than you expect lol...Fouch is legit...I am not sure that they will come up with a victory but I think that the Sycamore offensive attack is greatly improved

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 24th, 2010, 9:46 pm
by 45otseoj
dgreenwell3 wrote:
45otseoj wrote:Western... BIG

disagree....lol I think the Sycamores are better than you expect lol...Fouch is legit...I am not sure that they will come up with a victory but I think that the Sycamore offensive attack is greatly improved

I guess we'll see! Not sure what has been so "legit" about Fouch's first two performances. The Trees put up a lot of points against a lower division team (like you should) and were held to 7 points at Cincinatti (like most expected).

Question for INSU fans... What's with having 2 games against lower division competition?

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 24th, 2010, 9:51 pm
by JayJ79
45otseoj wrote:Question for INSU fans... What's with having 2 games against lower division competition?


Yeah, it really hurts their chances of making the playoffs. :lol:

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 24th, 2010, 9:54 pm
by dgreenwell3
After last year we had to get a revenge game against Quincy lol...I mean I guess at least we clearly won against our D 2 opponnent is the way I look at it lol...Instead we beat them 57-7...but I mean of course we didn't beat or have an amazing showing against Cincy so we will just see lol

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 24th, 2010, 10:18 pm
by JayJ79
dgreenwell3 wrote:at least we clearly won against our D 2 opponnent is the way I look at it lol...Instead we beat them 57-7...

not everyone can be like Illinois State and have exciting 55-54 games against D-II opponents.

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 25th, 2010, 8:46 am
by jlandrus11
It is sad to say that ISU had a bad loss to UC after UC only lost 1 game in the 2009 season, isn't it?

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 25th, 2010, 9:24 am
by 45otseoj
JayJ79 wrote:
dgreenwell3 wrote:at least we clearly won against our D 2 opponnent is the way I look at it lol...Instead we beat them 57-7...

not everyone can be like Illinois State and have exciting 55-54 games against D-II opponents.

You're right. Terrific game...

Re: Sycamores Vs. Leathernecks

PostPosted: September 26th, 2010, 10:53 pm
by 45otseoj
dgreenwell3 wrote:
45otseoj wrote:Western... BIG

disagree....lol I think the Sycamores are better than you expect lol...Fouch is legit...I am not sure that they will come up with a victory but I think that the Sycamore offensive attack is greatly improved

I guess we saw.
7 points.
Fouch: 6/17, 52 yards, 0 TDS, 1 INT.

Strange box score: 28 passes, 112 rushes.