Page 3 of 3

Re: Big 10 - Legends and Leaders new divisional names

PostPosted: December 15th, 2010, 11:11 am
by dgreenwell3
LOL maybe I was yanking your chain....lol I wont be there unfortunately, i have a business trip...

Re: Big 10 - Legends and Leaders new divisional names

PostPosted: December 15th, 2010, 11:13 am
by 45otseoj
dgreenwell3 wrote:LOL maybe I was yanking your chain....lol I wont be there unfortunately, i have a business trip...

:bs:

;)

Re: Big 10 - Legends and Leaders new divisional names

PostPosted: December 17th, 2010, 7:06 pm
by MVCfans
Big Ten is already considering changing the names:

CHICAGO -- Jim Delany has spent more than two decades as commissioner of the Big Ten, overseeing two conference expansions and the formation of the Big Ten Network.

None of it prepared him for the overwhelmingly negative reaction to the conference's new division names.

Delany said during an interview with WGN AM-720 in Chicago on Thursday that the names Legends and Leaders were picked to highlight the conference's rich history, and that "to a great extent it's fallen on deaf ears." Many fans have instead mocked the names and asked officials to reconsider, which Delany said could happen after the first of the year.


http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5930029